Case Law Details
Case Name : Commissioner of Central Excise Vs Thermax Ltd. (CESTAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : APPEAL No. E/85248/2017
Date of Judgement/Order : 11/04/2018
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All CESTAT CESTAT Mumbai
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
Commissioner of Central Excise Vs Thermax Ltd. (CESTAT Mumbai)
On perusal of the records, it is seen that the respondent had procured duty paid inputs on which CENVAT credit was availed but cleared the goods, as such, on a sale value which was higher than the purchase CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 provide for clearance of inputs, as such, subject to debit of duty that was availed as credit at the time of receipt of goods. It is not in doubt that higher duty was discharged at the time of clearance of the goods; there is thus, no
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.