Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Commissioner of Central Excise Vs Thermax Ltd. (CESTAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : APPEAL No. E/85248/2017
Date of Judgement/Order : 11/04/2018
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs Thermax Ltd. (CESTAT Mumbai)

On perusal of the records, it is seen that the respondent had procured duty paid inputs on which CENVAT credit was availed but cleared the goods, as such, on a sale value which was higher than the purchase CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 provide for clearance of inputs, as such, subject to debit of duty that was availed as credit at the time of receipt of goods. It is not in doubt that higher duty was discharged at the time of clearance of the goods; there is thus, no

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31