ITAT Chandigarh held that excess stock found during the course of survey cannot be brought to tax under the deeming provisions of section 69B of the Income Tax Act as the same is undeclared business income and not unexplained investment.
Chandigarh ITAT rules on jurisdiction to levy fee u/s 234E on TDS returns, excluding pre-June 2015 period. Details of Batra Exports Vs DCIT case and analysis.
Delve into the analysis of a trust appeal against the rejection of its 80G registration under the Income Tax Act, 1961, due to limitation issues. Learn about technical glitches, legal arguments, and the final verdict.
ITAT Chandigarh held that addition invoking the deeming provisions of section 69 r.w.s. 115BBE of the Income Tax Act unjustified as nature and source of undisclosed income/ investment duly explained by the assessee.
Chandigarh ITAT ruled interest income from cooperative bank eligible for deduction under Sec 80P(2)(d). Detailed analysis of the case.
Chandigarh ITAT allows additional evidence in assessments under section 144, ensuring fair taxpayer treatment and legal compliance.
Dive into the recent ITAT judgment on Sec 69B & 115BBE, exploring the treatment of unrecorded stock in a business survey. Analysis of AO, CIT(A), and ITAT perspectives.
The crux of the matter lies in the alleged non-compliance with CBDT Circulars, emphasizing the mandatory nature of DIN in all communications.
ITAT Chandigarh held that initiation of reassessment proceeding merely on the fact that AO has not carried out independent enquiries of confirmations from the creditors, without pointing out any deficiency or inaccuracy, cannot be a base to hold that order was erroneous in so far as prejudicial to the interest of revenue. Accordingly, reassessment unsustainable.
ITAT Chandigarh held that imposition of penalty u/s. 271(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act unjustified as special audit completed u/s. 142(2A) and audit report submitted within the extended time limit provide by AO.
