If AO adopts a plausible view, even if two views are possible, the assessment cannot be deemed erroneous merely because the PCIT holds a different opinion.
Understand the implications of the Parulben Vijaykumar Patel vs ITO case from ITAT Ahmedabad. Detailed analysis and conclusion provided.
ITAT Ahmedabad rules no tax on cash deposits from relatives if affidavits provided. Sakina Ahmedali Kantavala vs ITO case highlights proper affidavit usage in tax assessments.
Read the detailed analysis of Chaudhari Nanubhai Jeshingbhai (HUF) Vs DCIT case where the ITAT Ahmedabad ruled on reducing agricultural income based on expenditure claimed by the assessee.
Tribunal upholds CIT(A) decisions in DCIT Vs Astral Limited case, offering key insights on TP adjustments, ESOP expenses, and Section 14A disallowance.
ITAT Ahmedabad deletes ₹4.45 crore addition under Section 69. Money from JDS Industries not deemed as Global Ship Trade P. Ltd’s income. Detailed case analysis.
Read about the case of Waghodia Urban Co. Op. Bank Limited vs. Director of Income Tax regarding a penalty levied under Section 271FA for delay in filing SFT-005, where the excuse of server issue was dismissed.
Read the detailed analysis of ITAT Ahmedabad’s order canceling penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. Co-owner status and lack of concealment discussed.
Explore the detailed analysis of the ITAT Ahmedabad order regarding the rejection of registration of Parul University Alumni Association due to a mismatch in trust name and objectives.
Read the detailed analysis of Vivek Prahladbhai Patel vs ITO case where ITAT Ahmedabad deletes cash deposit addition under section 69A of Income Tax Act 1961.
