ITAT Ahmedabad sets aside CIT(A) order, emphasizing that genuine explanations for delays in filing appeals for high-value tax disputes must be considered.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that addition u/s. 69A towards unexplained money [on-money transaction] simply on the basis of presumptions without any concrete evidence is liable to be deleted. Accordingly, addition u/s. 69A deleted as it lacks a valid basis.
ITAT Ahmedabad restored matter of registration under section 80G(5)(iii) of the Income Tax Act to the file of CIT(E) for verification that expenditure on religious activities was within the threshold limit of 5% as specified under section 80G(5) of the Act.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that revisionary proceedings under section 263 of the Income Tax Act is not sustainable in law since Assessing Officer examined the aspect of disallowance of bogus losses on sale of steel scrap and took plausible view.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that disallowance of expenses under section 14A of the Income Tax Act not justifiable as there was sufficient own interest free funds available with the assessee for making investment. Thus, appeal of assessee allowed.
ITAT Ahmedabad directs reassessment in Neha Modi’s case on Rs. 47.79 lakh cash deposit under Sec. 69, citing lack of analysis on business transactions.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that assessment order passed against non-existent entity is an invalid assessment order and hence entire assessment framed is liable to be quashed. Accordingly, appeal of assessee allowed.
Tribunal also took note of the fact that AO had merely reproduced identical reasons for multiple years without verifying facts or forming a belief based on individual year-specific material.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that addition u/s. 68 of the Income Tax Act towards capital contribution deleted since assessee furnished adequate evidence to prove the identity, genuineness and creditworthiness of the partner. Accordingly, appeal of revenue dismissed.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act unsustainable since revenue/ department failed to establish that LTCG earned is non-genuine. Accordingly, appeal of revenue dismissed.
