Excise Duty Act, Rules Articles News Notification Circulars Instructions. Input Credit, Cenvat, Duty Rate, SSI Exemption, Excise on Jewellery,Excise on Garment
Excise Duty : The Supreme Court upholds CENVAT credit for telecom infrastructure, ruling in favor of telecom operators on towers and shelters....
Excise Duty : The MOOWR scheme offers deferred duties, export benefits, and operational ease for manufacturers in India, aiding growth but facin...
Excise Duty : Understand windfall tax, imposed on oil and gas companies due to unforeseen profit gains. Learn its implications and why India int...
Excise Duty : Explore the legal intricacies of challenging the Excise Department's notice for a public limited company's change in management vi...
Excise Duty : Explore the Madras High Courts decision in India Cement Limited v. Commissioner of Customs, allowing Cenvat credit for electricity...
Excise Duty : Govt clarifies tax increase on tobacco products, citing changes in excise duty on cigarettes and GST rules. Revenue funds overall ...
Excise Duty : Supreme Court admits Ecoboard Industries Ltd.'s appeal on excise duty for intermediate products, questioning Tribunal's duty impo...
Excise Duty : Key changes in excise duty and Clean Environment Cess under Finance (No. 2) Bill, 2024, including extended deadlines and exemption...
Excise Duty : Case Title: M/s. Marwadi Shares and Finance Ltd. Vs. Union of India & Ors.; Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 27124/2023; Dat...
Excise Duty : CBIC, under the Ministry of Finance, seeks feedback on the proposed Central Excise Bill 2024. Stakeholders can submit suggestions ...
Excise Duty : CESTAT Hyderabad directs refund of CVD/SAD paid post-GST on failed EPCG export obligation, citing eligibility under transitional...
Excise Duty : Delhi High Court rules mandatory pre-deposit under Section 35F for tax appeals filed after 2014 amendment cannot be waived, citing...
Excise Duty : Chhattisgarh High Court sets aside Central Excise show cause notices pending over 11 years, citing unreasonable delay and statutor...
Excise Duty : Rajasthan High Court criticized the CESTAT for failing to consider and discuss the binding precedent set by the Supreme Court in B...
Excise Duty : CESTAT Mumbai rules Spacewood Furnishers eligible for cash refund of CVD/SAD/Cesses paid post-GST for Advance License default unde...
Excise Duty : CBIC sets up interim boards for settlement across Delhi, Kolkata, Mumbai, and Chennai, appointing principal chief commissioners an...
Excise Duty : Four Interim Boards for Settlement under Central Excise Act established in Delhi, Kolkata, Mumbai, and Chennai by CBIC notificatio...
Excise Duty : Indian government revises central excise duty on petrol to Rs. 13/litre and diesel to Rs. 10/litre, effective April 8, 2025....
Excise Duty : CBIC assigns post-GST legacy excise and service tax appeals to designated officers for adjudication. Details available in attached...
Excise Duty : Govt extends provisions under Excise Notification 11/2017 from 2025 to 2026. Changes take effect on February 2, 2025....
Delve into the Rama Ferro Alloys & Finance Private Limited Vs Commissioner of CGST & CX case where CESTAT Kolkata rules in favour of the appellant regarding utilization of cenvated inputs in job work.
CESTAT Chandigarh held that job worker is the one who works upon the goods supplied directly or indirectly by the principal manufacturer. In absence of the said supply, appellants do not fit into the definition of ‘job worker’. Hence, demand unsustainable.
Explore CESTAT Mumbai judgement in Astoria Agro & Allied Inds Pvt Ltd Vs Commissioner of CGST, underlining importance of evidence consideration in rejecting Cenvat Credit claims
CESTAT held that the utilization of credit by any unit within the same entity would not cause any loss to the Exchequer. This is because the credit disallowed to one unit is proportionally made available to the second unit. From a company’s perspective, the net credit availed and utilized remains unchanged.
Allahabad High Court in Madhyamik Shiksha Parishad vs. CESTAT, allows revival of appeal before CESTAT subject to payment of Pre-Deposit
High Court held that the Order of Appellate Authority allowing refund to assessee cannot be ignored solely because Revenue decided to challenge the order allowing refund, directed the Revenue to disburse refund along with interest and clarified that Revenue is not precluded from availing any remedy and in case Revenue succeeds they would be entitled to recovery the amount disbursed.
CESTAT, Kolkata made a significant ruling regarding the amendment in Rule 14 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Previous version of the rule stated ‘taken or utilized,’ but it was modified to ‘taken and utilized.’ This alteration in wording clearly indicates the legislative intent to exclude the imposition of interest when the credit has been taken but not utilized.
CESTAT Ahmedabad held that trade discount is not includible in the assessable value hence central excise duty is not payable on the same.
Delhi High Court’s ruling on Classic Decorators’ appeal for a pre-deposit waiver against a limitation-barred service tax demand order
CESTAT Kolkata held that as per substituted provisions of Rule 14 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, interest is not leviable where wrongly availed credit is only taken but not utilized.
