Excise Duty Act, Rules Articles News Notification Circulars Instructions. Input Credit, Cenvat, Duty Rate, SSI Exemption, Excise on Jewellery,Excise on Garment
Excise Duty : The Supreme Court upholds CENVAT credit for telecom infrastructure, ruling in favor of telecom operators on towers and shelters....
Excise Duty : The MOOWR scheme offers deferred duties, export benefits, and operational ease for manufacturers in India, aiding growth but facin...
Excise Duty : Understand windfall tax, imposed on oil and gas companies due to unforeseen profit gains. Learn its implications and why India int...
Excise Duty : Explore the legal intricacies of challenging the Excise Department's notice for a public limited company's change in management vi...
Excise Duty : Explore the Madras High Courts decision in India Cement Limited v. Commissioner of Customs, allowing Cenvat credit for electricity...
Excise Duty : Govt clarifies tax increase on tobacco products, citing changes in excise duty on cigarettes and GST rules. Revenue funds overall ...
Excise Duty : Supreme Court admits Ecoboard Industries Ltd.'s appeal on excise duty for intermediate products, questioning Tribunal's duty impo...
Excise Duty : Key changes in excise duty and Clean Environment Cess under Finance (No. 2) Bill, 2024, including extended deadlines and exemption...
Excise Duty : Case Title: M/s. Marwadi Shares and Finance Ltd. Vs. Union of India & Ors.; Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 27124/2023; Dat...
Excise Duty : CBIC, under the Ministry of Finance, seeks feedback on the proposed Central Excise Bill 2024. Stakeholders can submit suggestions ...
Excise Duty : CESTAT Hyderabad directs refund of CVD/SAD paid post-GST on failed EPCG export obligation, citing eligibility under transitional...
Excise Duty : Delhi High Court rules mandatory pre-deposit under Section 35F for tax appeals filed after 2014 amendment cannot be waived, citing...
Excise Duty : Chhattisgarh High Court sets aside Central Excise show cause notices pending over 11 years, citing unreasonable delay and statutor...
Excise Duty : Rajasthan High Court criticized the CESTAT for failing to consider and discuss the binding precedent set by the Supreme Court in B...
Excise Duty : CESTAT Mumbai rules Spacewood Furnishers eligible for cash refund of CVD/SAD/Cesses paid post-GST for Advance License default unde...
Excise Duty : CBIC sets up interim boards for settlement across Delhi, Kolkata, Mumbai, and Chennai, appointing principal chief commissioners an...
Excise Duty : Four Interim Boards for Settlement under Central Excise Act established in Delhi, Kolkata, Mumbai, and Chennai by CBIC notificatio...
Excise Duty : Indian government revises central excise duty on petrol to Rs. 13/litre and diesel to Rs. 10/litre, effective April 8, 2025....
Excise Duty : CBIC assigns post-GST legacy excise and service tax appeals to designated officers for adjudication. Details available in attached...
Excise Duty : Govt extends provisions under Excise Notification 11/2017 from 2025 to 2026. Changes take effect on February 2, 2025....
CESTAT Ahmedabad held that services availed in respect of effluent treatment plant for treatment of industrial waste is in relation to the overall manufacturing activity and hence CENVAT Credit is duly admissible.
Read about the Supreme Court’s decision on whether penalty can be imposed on self-assessment returns for alleged suppression of facts. Analysis of the case involving Commissioner, Central Excise And Customs vs Reliance Industries Ltd. Learn about the implications for GST and Income-tax matters.
CESTAT Kolkata held that denial of credit of service tax stating that coal and iron ore mines situated away from the factory is unsustainable as no material has been placed on record by the revenue to substantiate that the mines were owned by separate entities.
CESTAT Kolkata held that receipt, utilization and duty paid nature of the input Sponge Iron was not in dispute. Hence, CENVAT credit duly available as input Sponge Iron is utilized in manufacturing of finished goods i.e. Pig Iron.
The case of Hindalco Industries Limited Vs C.C.E-Bharuch, involving a forged VKGUY/DEPB licence issue, has been remanded for reconsideration by the CESTAT Ahmedabad. Read for in-depth analysis and conclusions on this case.
The CESTAT Ahmedabad upholds Commissioner (Appeals)’ decision to remand the C.C.E. & S.T Vs Indian Oil Corporation Ltd case back to adjudicating authority for re-examination of documentary evidence regarding unjust enrichment.
CESTAT set aside the order demanding excise duty and held that the buyer who has paid a valuable consideration could not be proceeded upon by taking the aid of a larger period of limitation as per Section 11A(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 unless it is proved that the buyer was also involved in fraud.
CESTAT Chennai held that duty demand on semi-finished goods and finished goods not sustainable as goods are exported on payment of duty under section 3(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.
CESTAT Chennai held that when Form-H has been produced to establish that the goods have been exported the value of such clearances would not be included in the aggregate value so as to deny the SSI exemption.
CESTAT Chennai held that duty burden is shifted to the appellant unit only because facility under rule 12BB is opted. Also, penalty under section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 unwarranted when duty liability is paid with interest.
