Excise Duty Act, Rules Articles News Notification Circulars Instructions. Input Credit, Cenvat, Duty Rate, SSI Exemption, Excise on Jewellery,Excise on Garment
Excise Duty : The Supreme Court upholds CENVAT credit for telecom infrastructure, ruling in favor of telecom operators on towers and shelters....
Excise Duty : The MOOWR scheme offers deferred duties, export benefits, and operational ease for manufacturers in India, aiding growth but facin...
Excise Duty : Understand windfall tax, imposed on oil and gas companies due to unforeseen profit gains. Learn its implications and why India int...
Excise Duty : Explore the legal intricacies of challenging the Excise Department's notice for a public limited company's change in management vi...
Excise Duty : Explore the Madras High Courts decision in India Cement Limited v. Commissioner of Customs, allowing Cenvat credit for electricity...
Excise Duty : Govt clarifies tax increase on tobacco products, citing changes in excise duty on cigarettes and GST rules. Revenue funds overall ...
Excise Duty : Supreme Court admits Ecoboard Industries Ltd.'s appeal on excise duty for intermediate products, questioning Tribunal's duty impo...
Excise Duty : Key changes in excise duty and Clean Environment Cess under Finance (No. 2) Bill, 2024, including extended deadlines and exemption...
Excise Duty : Case Title: M/s. Marwadi Shares and Finance Ltd. Vs. Union of India & Ors.; Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 27124/2023; Dat...
Excise Duty : CBIC, under the Ministry of Finance, seeks feedback on the proposed Central Excise Bill 2024. Stakeholders can submit suggestions ...
Excise Duty : Analysis of CESTAT Kolkata's decision in Mahavir Ferro Alloys Pvt. Ltd. Vs CGST & Central Excise, focusing on alleged clandestine ...
Excise Duty : CESTAT Kolkata allows CENVAT Credit to Rexon Strips Ltd., ruling that inputs used in capital goods are eligible, setting aside pri...
Excise Duty : Appellant and SKF India are both subsidiaries of AB SKF Sweden. Appellant & SKF India have agreed to pool & combine their respecti...
Excise Duty : The Settlement Commission held that the rectification of errors under Section 154 was confined to arithmetical or clerical errors ...
Excise Duty : Supreme Court held that the agreement between the oil marketing companies indicates that the price of petroleum products agreed un...
Excise Duty : Govt extends provisions under Excise Notification 11/2017 from 2025 to 2026. Changes take effect on February 2, 2025....
Excise Duty : Notification 01/2025 outlines appointments and roles of Central Excise Officers for handling appeals under the Excise Act, specify...
Excise Duty : The Ministry of Finance rescinds Central Excise Notification No. 08/2022 with immediate effect under public interest provisions....
Excise Duty : The Ministry of Finance amends Central Excise Rules, 2017, removing specific provisos in Rules 18 and 19. Changes take effect imme...
Excise Duty : The Ministry of Finance rescinds Central Excise Notifications No. 10/2022 and 11/2022 under Notification No. 30/2024, effective im...
Calcutta High Court upholds the rejection of a retraction after 3 years and 9 months in the case of Anurag Steel Enterprise vs. Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise.
Case revolved around principle of restitution and whether petitioner was entitled to a refund of pre-deposit amount in light of overturning of original order.
CESTAT Bangalore ruling on AEG Power Solutions (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise case underscores that misdeclaration invites extended limitation.
Kerala High Court directs the Excise Commissioner to consider a representation against the proposed liquor outlet near a forest area alongside the application of Kerala State Beverages Corporation.
Explore the CESTAT Kolkata verdict on CENVAT Credit for steel items. Detailed analysis, rulings, and implications.
Meghalaya High Court dismissed appeal, ruling that issues concerning service value must be appealed to Supreme Court under section 35L of Central Excise Act.
Compelling imperative consequent upon contradictory reports cannot be ignored. For central excise authorities to assume antipodal positions is neither becoming nor legally proper
A detailed analysis of the Neelachal Ispat Nigam Ltd. Vs Union of India case from the Orissa High Court. Learn how prolonged adjudication delay can render decisions invalid.
Read about the Supreme Court’s decision on whether labelling containers qualifies as ‘manufacture’ for CENVAT credit under the Central Excise Act. Detailed analysis and conclusion provided.
Understand CESTAT’s decision on inclusion of separately shown freight and insurance charges in excisable goods’ assessable value.
