Excise Duty Act, Rules Articles News Notification Circulars Instructions. Input Credit, Cenvat, Duty Rate, SSI Exemption, Excise on Jewellery,Excise on Garment
Excise Duty : The Supreme Court upholds CENVAT credit for telecom infrastructure, ruling in favor of telecom operators on towers and shelters....
Excise Duty : The MOOWR scheme offers deferred duties, export benefits, and operational ease for manufacturers in India, aiding growth but facin...
Excise Duty : Understand windfall tax, imposed on oil and gas companies due to unforeseen profit gains. Learn its implications and why India int...
Excise Duty : Explore the legal intricacies of challenging the Excise Department's notice for a public limited company's change in management vi...
Excise Duty : Explore the Madras High Courts decision in India Cement Limited v. Commissioner of Customs, allowing Cenvat credit for electricity...
Excise Duty : Govt clarifies tax increase on tobacco products, citing changes in excise duty on cigarettes and GST rules. Revenue funds overall ...
Excise Duty : Supreme Court admits Ecoboard Industries Ltd.'s appeal on excise duty for intermediate products, questioning Tribunal's duty impo...
Excise Duty : Key changes in excise duty and Clean Environment Cess under Finance (No. 2) Bill, 2024, including extended deadlines and exemption...
Excise Duty : Case Title: M/s. Marwadi Shares and Finance Ltd. Vs. Union of India & Ors.; Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 27124/2023; Dat...
Excise Duty : CBIC, under the Ministry of Finance, seeks feedback on the proposed Central Excise Bill 2024. Stakeholders can submit suggestions ...
Excise Duty : Delhi HC rules that CESTAT cannot dismiss an appeal solely due to pre-deposit being made in the wrong account. Case sent back for ...
Excise Duty : Delhi HC rules CESTAT cannot dismiss an appeal for incorrect pre-deposit allocation when rules were unclear, directing a fresh hea...
Excise Duty : CESTAT Delhi rules against Leel Electricals Ltd., denying CENVAT Credit on ineligible invoices. The tribunal upholds tax demand an...
Excise Duty : The appellant herein has merely utilized the credit and, to the extent that rule 3(4) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 has not been sh...
Excise Duty : CESTAT Delhi overturns ₹10 lakh penalty under Rule 26(1), citing the absence of confiscation, a key requirement for imposing pen...
Excise Duty : Govt extends provisions under Excise Notification 11/2017 from 2025 to 2026. Changes take effect on February 2, 2025....
Excise Duty : Notification 01/2025 outlines appointments and roles of Central Excise Officers for handling appeals under the Excise Act, specify...
Excise Duty : The Ministry of Finance rescinds Central Excise Notification No. 08/2022 with immediate effect under public interest provisions....
Excise Duty : The Ministry of Finance amends Central Excise Rules, 2017, removing specific provisos in Rules 18 and 19. Changes take effect imme...
Excise Duty : The Ministry of Finance rescinds Central Excise Notifications No. 10/2022 and 11/2022 under Notification No. 30/2024, effective im...
Analysis of Raman Ispat Pvt Ltd Vs Cce Meerut case from Allahabad High Court. Once opted, excise duty payment method for a financial year cannot be changed midway.
Understand windfall tax, imposed on oil and gas companies due to unforeseen profit gains. Learn its implications and why India introduced it.
Ministry of Finance amends No. 18/2022-Central Excise to reduce Special Additional Excise Duty on Petroleum Crude production. Read Notification 15/2024 details here.
CESTAT Kolkata reduces penalty in Mittal Iron Foundry case, stating clandestine removal claims lack corroborative evidence.
In Kancor Ingredients Ltd vs Commissioner (CESTAT Allahabad), the court rules that accumulated Cenvat Credit refund is valid for goods exported without a bond.
CESTAT Delhi rules on the National Engineering Industries Limited vs. Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise case, focusing on service tax refunds and judicial discipline.
Calcutta High Court upholds the rejection of a retraction after 3 years and 9 months in the case of Anurag Steel Enterprise vs. Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise.
Case revolved around principle of restitution and whether petitioner was entitled to a refund of pre-deposit amount in light of overturning of original order.
CESTAT Bangalore ruling on AEG Power Solutions (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise case underscores that misdeclaration invites extended limitation.
Kerala High Court directs the Excise Commissioner to consider a representation against the proposed liquor outlet near a forest area alongside the application of Kerala State Beverages Corporation.
