Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : G M Builders Vs PCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017–18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

G M Builders Vs PCIT (ITAT Mumbai)

Assessee is a partnership firm who filed its return of income after 148 notice was issued. PCIT issued a notice after verification of the assessment records that the assessment was framed on the income declared in the return filed u/s 148. This implies that despite assessee’s income being greater than the maximum amount not chargeable to tax, he did not file the return of income and this return was furnished for the first time u/s 148. It was held that assessee has to be considered as a person who has under-reported its income u/s 270A(2)(b). Ho

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Amendment to Tolerance Limit Under Section 50C/56(2)(x) is Curative: ITAT Mumbai ITAT Allows Additional Local Language Documents, Rejects Section 69A Addition ITAT Bangalore Sets Aside Penalty order for serving on unrelated email ID Not Condoning Delay Amount to Legalising Illegal Order: ITAT Bangalore Reassessment Without Furnishing Reasons Invalid: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31