Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Section 263 Revision for Non-Initiation of Penalty Proceedings Erroneous: ITAT Mumbai

Case Law Details

Case Name
G M Builders Vs PCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2017–18
Advertisement
G M Builders Vs PCIT (ITAT Mumbai) Assessee is a partnership firm who filed its return of income after 148 notice was issued. PCIT issued a notice after verification of the assessment records that the assessment was framed on the income declared in the return filed u/s 148. This implies that despite assessee’s income being greater than the maximum amount not chargeable to tax, he did not file the return of income and this return was furnished for the first time u/s 148. It was held that assessee has to be considered as a person who has under-reported its income u/s 270A(2)(b). However in the...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 5,510

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *