Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Saggar Parimmal Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Saggar Parimmal Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Amendment in Tolerance Limit Pursuant to Section 50C/56(2)(x) is Curative in Nature: ITAT Mumbai In the case of Saggar Parimal vs. ITO Mumbai & Ketan Kumar Sagar vs. ITO Mumbai, both the assessees being co-owners jointly purchased a residential flat in AY 18-19. Provisions of sec 56(2)(x) were invoked since difference between stamp duty value & declared value of property worked out to 6.56%  which exceeded 5% of consideration resulting in an addition by AO. This tolerance limit was introduced by Finance Act, 2018, w.e.f. 01.04.2019 & was subse...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 54F Exemption Allowed on Sale of Redeveloped Flat: ITAT Mumbai Section 28 Land Acquisition Interest Exempt as Enhanced Compensation: ITAT Delhi Bogus Purchase Addition Cannot Be Based on Suspicion Alone: ITAT Chennai Section 69 Addition Deleted as No Evidence Linked Joint Holder to Alleged On-Money: ITAT Mumbai WhatsApp Chats Accepted as Evidence, On-Money Addition Limited to 25%: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031