Delhi High Court held that section 195 of the Act has no application once the nature of payment is determined as salary and deduction has been made under Section 192 of the Act.
Hitech Sweet Water Technologies Pvt. Ltd Vs State of Gujarat (Gujarat High Court) Challenge to the orders and preceding show-cause notices are based on the ground that the order came to be passed in gross violation of principles of natural justice inasmuch as the petitioner was not granted opportunity of being heard. By placing reliance […]
OSI Systems Pvt Ltd Vs Commissioner of Central Tax (CESTAT Hyderabad) The brief facts are that the appellant was an assessee under the service tax regime and they migrated to GST regime and they also filed TRAN-1 for taking forward the credit which was lying in their Cenvat credit register. Subsequently, it was pointed out […]
ITAT Chandigarh held that Ld. NFAC ignoring the submissions and the documents being sought to be filed as additional evidences and dismissal of assessees appeal without even commenting on the submissions or the documents is patently and legally wrong.
Azam Laminators (P) Limited Vs Commercial Tax Officer (Madras High Court) The specific case of the petitioner is that the petitioner had effected sale of M.G. Plain Kraft Paper to a merchant exporter, who, in turn had received a purchase order from a buyer from Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia for Parcel Leaf Size and that the […]
In re Shree Ambica Geotex Pvt. Ltd (GST AAR Gujarat) Whether the product, namely, Geomembranes merits classification under Heading 5911, Sub Heading 59111000 or Sub Heading 59119090, as Textile products, coated, covered or laminated with plastic, used for technical purposes? Geomembrane merits classification at HSN 5911, tariff item 59111000. FULL TEXT OF THE ORDER OF […]
AAR Haryana held that Recoveries On Account Of Notice Pay, Bond Forfeiture, Canteen Charges, ID Cards Replacement As Well As The Liquidated Damages & Forfeiture Of Earnest Money and Security Deposit Not Taxable Under GST.
Applicability of TDS under Section 194N: Whenever any Banking Company (within the meaning of Banking Regulation Act, 1949), Cooperative Bank or a post office pays any amount or aggregate of amount as the case may be, in cash exceeding One crore to any person from one or more accounts during previous year, they are liable to deduct TDS equal to 2% of such sum.
Explore the clash between the GST Authority and the Judiciary in matters of e-way bills. Discover the irregularities in detention orders and their impact on businesses.
GST Rule 37 relates to Reversal of input tax credit in the case of non-payment of consideration of Invoice by a registered dealer to the supplier within 180 days period.
