Join our webinar on July 24-25 for an in-depth analysis of Union Budget 2024. Learn about tax proposals, sector impacts, and investment insights. Register now!
Join CA Sachin Jain for a live course on Input Tax Credit from a litigation perspective. Gain practical insights and master ITC complexities. Register now!
The reason for imposing costs on the petitioner is that on perusal of the translation filed by the petitioner, we find that the impugned judgment does not make out any head and tail. It is difficult to read much less to understand as to what the judgment contains.
In our opinion, for determining the income from the property, it should be rate of return on the investment of similar amount in another asset. Therefore, in our opinion, the Commissioner (Appeals) was fully justified in estimating the ALV on the basis of interest which assessee would have earned on the investment of the similar amount.
No scrutiny proceedings can be initiated if notice under section 143(2) is not received by assessee within the prescribed period.
Audit is just 5 letters words but its impact is far beyond these numbers. Every coin has two sides one GST is based on self assessment u/s 59, but if this provision is not controlled by any other provision then
When you finally opt for practice after coming out of the dilemma of whether to opt for practice or job; another big question that comes to your mind is How to grow practice. As advertisement and other means of soliciting clients are prohibited for Chartered Accountants
The Central Bureau of Investigation has filed a charge sheet before the Special Judge, CBI Cases, Ahmedabad against then Deputy Commissioner of Customs, Mundra and a private person in a bribery case.
VAT is effective from 1st January 2018 in the UAE though transactions will be in pipeline for the businesses as payment received or supplies done before effective date. Some of the key transitional rules and detailed Article 70 of the Executive Regulations of the UAE VAT Law.
A division bench of the Delhi ITAT, last week held that penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 cannot be levied if the Arm’s Length Price (ALP) was determined as per the scheme of section 92C in good faith and with due diligence.
