Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Archive: 28 May 2008

Posts in 28 May 2008

Notification No. 29/2008-Central Excise, Dated: 28.05.2008

May 28, 2008 448 Views 0 comment Print

In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 5A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (1 of 1944), the Central Government, on being satisfied that it is necessary in the public interest so to do, hereby makes the following further amendments in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue.

Exchange rate notification for Import of / exported goods w.e.f 1st June, 2008

May 28, 2008 487 Views 0 comment Print

In exercise of the powers conferred by section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962), and in supersession of the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) No.39/2008-CUSTOMS (N.T.), dated the 28th April, 2008 vide number S.O. 1033(E), dated the 28th April, 2008, except as respects things done or omitted to be done before such supersession, the Central Board of Excise and Customs hereby determines that the rate of exchange of conversion of each of the foreign currency specified in column (2) of each of Schedule I and Schedule II annexed hereto into Indian currency or vice versa shall, with effect from 1st June, 2008 be the rate mentioned against it in the corresponding entry in column (3) thereof, for the purpose of the said section, relating to imported and export goods.

Sanction of Customs duty refunds – Unjust Enrichment – reg

May 28, 2008 478 Views 0 comment Print

I am, accordingly, directed to request you to instruct the officers working under your jurisdiction to carefully examine this aspect of the refund claim before passing an Order-in-Original, so that unnecessary hardships caused to the applicants and protracted litigation in claiming refunds is avoided.

The amount of share application money received by a Company from alleged bogus shareholders cannot be regarded as undisclosed income under S. 68.

May 28, 2008 1274 Views 0 comment Print

CIT vs. Divine Leasing & Finance (SC) – The amount of share application money received by a Company from alleged bogus shareholders cannot be regarded as undisclosed income under S. 68 of I. T. Act for the simple reason that if the names of the alleged bogus shareholders are given to the AO, then the Department is free to proceed to re-open their individual assessments in accordance with law.

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
September 2024
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30