Corporate Law : The Supreme Court emphasizes strict scrutiny of FIRs under stringent laws like the UP Gangsters Act to prevent misuse in property ...
Custom Duty : The Supreme Court rules DRI officers as proper officers for customs under Section 28, overturning past judgments and reshaping tax...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court rules that failure to inform grounds of arrest violates Article 22(1), making the arrest illegal and warranting bail...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court stresses careful scrutiny in dowry harassment cases to prevent legal misuse, ruling in favor of quashing baseles...
Goods and Services Tax : SC clarifies ITC on construction under GST, applying the functionality test. High Court to decide if malls qualify as plants for I...
Corporate Law : Key IBC case law updates from Oct-Dec 2024, covering Supreme Court and High Court decisions on CoC powers, resolution plans, relat...
Income Tax : Government addresses Supreme Court judgment on tax exemptions for clergy and its implications on Hindu Undivided Families (HUFs) u...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court rejects regularisation of illegal constructions, irrespective of occupancy or investments, and calls for action agai...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court Collegium recommends three advocates—Ajay Digpaul, Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar, and Shwetasree Majumder—for ...
Corporate Law : SC rules on Special Court jurisdiction; NCLAT redefines financial debt; HC upholds IBBI regulations and addresses various insolven...
Income Tax : Supreme Court rules on penalty under Section 271E of the Income Tax Act in CIT vs. Jai Laxmi Rice Mills. Find out how assessment o...
Income Tax : Supreme Court dismissed the tax appeal in PCIT vs. Patanjali Foods, upholding the Bombay High Court's decision that reassessment n...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court held that for a Resolution Plan containing a combination should be examined by Committee of Creditors [CoC] only aft...
Income Tax : Supreme Court dismisses Bihar Police Building Construction Corporation's tax appeal due to significant delay....
Income Tax : Supreme Court dismisses tax case due to delay and lack of merit. Bombay High Court quashes reassessment notice against Teleperfor...
Income Tax : CBDT raises monetary limits for tax appeals: Rs. 60 lakh for ITAT, Rs. 2 crore for High Court, and Rs. 5 crore for Supreme Court, ...
Corporate Law : No restrictions on joint bank accounts or nominations for the queer community, as clarified by the Supreme Court and RBI in August...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court of India introduces new procedures for case adjournments effective 14th February 2024, detailing strict guidelines a...
Corporate Law : Explore the updated FAQs on the implementation of the EPFO judgment dated 04.11.2022. Understand proof requirements, pension compu...
Income Tax : Comprehensive guide on CBDT's directives for AOs concerning the Abhisar Buildwell Supreme Court verdict. Dive into its implication...
Explore the Supreme Court’s decision upholding the taxation of interest-free/concessional loans to bank employees as perquisites under Rule 3(7)(i) of the Income Tax Rules.
Explore how the Supreme Court’s ruling reinforces strict adherence to refund timelines under the Delhi Value Added Tax Act in the case of Commissioner vs FEMC Pratibha JV.
Supreme Court dismisses plea under Article 32 against 45-day payment rule. Detailed analysis of the judgment and implications for businesses.
Supreme Court directs police to avoid mechanical entries in history sheets based on caste, emphasizing dignity and fairness. Analysis of Amanatullah Khan case.
In the case of Principal Commissioner of Custom Vs Khan Sadaf, the Supreme Court of India dealt with the issue of whether the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) had the jurisdiction to entertain an application for compounding of an offence under Section 137 of the Customs Act, 1962.
Compensation by its very nature, had to be just. For suffering, no part of which was the claimant-appellant’s own fault, she had been awarded a sum which could, at best, be described as ‘paltry’. In regard to the application of the Eggshell-Skull Rule, the impugned judgment was silent as to how this rule applied to the present case.
Read the Supreme Courts landmark judgment ensuring children of armed forces personnel get fair treatment in education, regardless of their parents’ postings.
Read about the Supreme Court’s directive for e-filing and hybrid hearings in Uttar Pradesh district courts, enhancing accessibility to justice. Learn about the implications and significance of this landmark decision.
Supreme Court held that that the amounts covered by security deposits under the agreements constitute financial debt. Accordingly, section 5(7) of IBC categorizes the person as financial creditor if a financial debt is owned to it.
The central question raised was whether the Assessee could claim exemption under Section 10(38) after initially not doing so during the assessment proceedings.
