Income Tax : Understand the impact of Section 43B(h) on businesses: Learn about deductions for MSME payments and the importance of timely payme...
Income Tax : Explore the impact of Finance Act, 2023, on MSME payment enforcement under section 43B(h) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Understand ...
Income Tax : Explore the implications of the recent Income Tax amendment to Section 43B affecting MSMEs. Understand how timely payments are cru...
Income Tax : Explore key income tax compliance requirements for charitable and educational institutions under the Income Tax Act for the assess...
Income Tax : Discover simplified taxation scheme under Section 44AD of Income Tax Act. Learn eligibility criteria, exemptions, and key insights...
Income Tax : The ITAT Bangalore ruled that income tax additions can't be based solely on unsubstantiated loose slips, emphasizing the need for ...
Income Tax : ITAT held that time limit for filing rectification applications starts only when assessee is aware of order passed, not from date ...
Income Tax : Analysis of Om Prakash Vs PCIT (ITAT Delhi) case reveals PCIT's jurisdiction limitations on tax issues under Land Acquisition Act ...
Income Tax : Explore the detailed analysis of Jai Parkash Vs PCIT (ITAT Delhi) case where the assessment jurisdiction dispute regarding interes...
Goods and Services Tax : Allahabad High Court held that penalty under Section 54(1)(2) of the U.P. VAT Act, 2008 cannot be imposed in cases, wherein, the a...
CESTAT Chennai held that imported goods being handheld machines popularly known as brush cutter is classifiable under CTH 84672900 and parts of brush cutter is classifiable under CTH 84679900.
Understand the impact of Section 43B(h) on businesses: Learn about deductions for MSME payments and the importance of timely payments to avoid penalties and interest.
ITAT Mumbai held that compensation received by the assessee in out of court settlement for unilaterally terminating certain obligation under the agreement is an income assessed to business income and not an income assessed to capital gains as claimed by the assessee.
ITAT Delhi held that PCIT cannot assume revisional jurisdiction under section 263 of the Income Tax Act when in case of debatable issue, out of the two possible views, AO accepts one of the views.
ITAT Chennai held that transfer pricing adjustment towards brand development services unjustified in absence of contract amongst the assessee and its associated enterprises. Accordingly, AO directed to delete addition made towards brand fee adjustment.
Jharkhand High Court held that pre-show cause notice consultation u/s. 28(1)(a) of the Customs Act, 1962 are mandatory and imperative in character. Accordingly, entire proceedings carried out without pre-show cause notice consultation is liable to be quashed.
Maersk Line India Pvt Ltd’s case on confiscated containers under Customs Notification analyzed by CESTAT Ahmedabad. Details on import, violation, and verdict.
Explore the ITAT Delhi order on Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. vs DCIT, addressing additions, exemptions, and disallowances. Get insights into income tax assessments.
CESTAT Ahmedabad imposes penalties under Customs Act for fraudulent MEIS benefit claim by Fashion Accessories, highlighting stringent legal consequences.
Gloster Cables claims ownership of the GLOSTER trademark in a dispute with Fort Gloster during insolvency proceedings. Learn about the arguments on jurisdiction, assignment validity, and the impact of the BIFR order.
