Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Samsung India Electronics Pvt. Ltd Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Allahabad)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Samsung India Electronics Pvt. Ltd Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Allahabad)

Conclusion: While at the time of debonding, the value of raw material cleared had to be valued at the time of importation, and the rate of duty was the effective rate of duty leviable on the imported goods at the time of debonding. Therefore, the demand was not sustainable in the case as the goods were initially imported and used within assessee’s 100% EOU and the exemption was claimed only during debonding.

Held: Assessee-company was registered with th

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
April 2025
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930