Income Tax : Explore tax implications under Section 56(2)(vii)(b) and reassessment norms in property transactions. Judicial rulings emphasize e...
Income Tax : Explore key court rulings on reassessment under Section 148 post-2021 amendments, covering procedural changes, taxpayer rights, an...
Income Tax : Written submission against wrong cash deposit notice under Section 148A(b), highlighting errors and lack of independent inquiry....
Income Tax : The Supreme Court’s Rajeev Bansal case clarified the validity of reassessment notices for AY 2013-14 to 2018-19 and introduced t...
Income Tax : The Supreme Court's rulings clarify reassessment procedures under the Income Tax Act, addressing validity, TOLA implications, and ...
Income Tax : Discover how Finance Act 2021 revamped assessment and reassessment procedures under Income-tax Act, impacting notices, time limits...
Income Tax : Humble Representation for modification of Section 151 of the Income Tax Act relating to Sanction for issue of Notice under sec. 14...
Income Tax : Income Tax Gazetted Officers’ Association requested CBDT to issue Clarification in respect of the judgement of Hon’ble Supreme...
Corporate Law : Non- extension of the Time Barring Date for assessment of reopened cases and issuance of the notices for reopening – difficu...
Income Tax : Assessee challenged this, arguing the procedure under Section 148A was not followed. The Supreme Court ruled that notices after 31...
Income Tax : Thus, a substantial portion of the cause of action has accrued at Kolkata. Applying the principle of forum convenience, it would b...
Income Tax : ITAT Rajkot held that the reassessment notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act has been issued without obtaining the approv...
Income Tax : Patna High Court held that notice must be supported by reasons. Accordingly, since notice issued under section 148 of the Income T...
Income Tax : Rajasthan High Court dismisses Bhag Chand Jangid' s plea against tax assessment due to delayed challenge of the initial order. Alt...
Income Tax : Supreme Court in the matter of Shri Ashish Agarwal, several representations were received asking for time-barring date of such cas...
Corporate Law : Income Tax Gazetted Officers’ Association (W.B.) Unit Date: 02.02.2023. To The Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, W...
Income Tax : CBDT directed that cases reopened u/s 147/148A in consonance with Judgement of SC in case of UoI vs. Ashish Agarwal & CBDT instruc...
Income Tax : Consequent to order passed by Allahabad High Court passing severe strictures and proposing to levy exemplary cost of Rs 50 lakhs i...
Income Tax : Salient features of new Section 148 to 151A 'i.e. assessment/reassessment procedure of Income Escaping Assessment...
Rajasthan High Court rejected Agarwal Polysacks’ plea against IT reassessment under Section 147, holding the company accountable for transactions by its power of attorney holder.
Delhi High Court held that provision of section 292B doesn’t include passing of order u/s. 148 overlooking error apparent on the face of the record. Thus, order passed overlooking error is liable to be set aside.
Gujarat High Court rules that a jurisdictional assessing officer cannot override the faceless assessment scheme under Section 151A of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Jaipur held that amount of sundry debtor recorded in books of account are not any money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article and hence doesn’t qualify as unexplained money under section 69A of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Pune held that approval of Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax [PCCIT] required for order passed under section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act beyond three years from the end of assessment year.
Rajasthan High Court quashes IT notice against Prateek Bulls and Bears Pvt Ltd due to lack of evidence linking bank account to the assessee.
Punjab & Haryana HC quashes Section 148 notice issued by jurisdictional AO, ruling that only NFAC has authority under CBDT Circular dated 29.03.2022.
Punjab & Haryana High Court quashes notice u/s 148 issued by jurisdictional AO, ruling that only NFAC has authority post CBDT Circular dated 29.03.2022.
Delhi HC rules AO functus officio post-assessment, quashing reassessment notice against Vivo India for lack of due process and violation of natural justice.
ITAT Rajkot held that addition on account of unexplained investment in purchase of immovable property u/s 69 of the Income Tax Act is liable to be deleted since assessee sufficiently proved that all the payments are made from wife’s NRI account.