Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Bigtree Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Service Tax VI (CESTAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : Service Tax Appeal No. 87428 of 2016
Date of Judgement/Order : 17/04/2024
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Bigtree Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Service Tax VI (CESTAT Mumbai)

The case of Bigtree Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. versus the Commissioner of Service Tax VI, as adjudicated by CESTAT Mumbai, revolves around the taxation of services provided by the appellant, particularly in relation to their online ticketing platform under the brand BookMyShow.

Bigtree Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. operates an online ticketing platform via www.bookmyshow.com, facilitating customers in booking tickets for movies and various shows. The appellant’s revenue model involves collecting convenience charges or fees for this service and remitting the ticket cost to cinema halls or event organizers. However, a key contention arises concerning transactions with credit card companies, where discounts or free tickets offered by these companies to customers are reimbursed through debit notes issued by the appellant.

The crux of the dispute lies in whether the amounts collected from card companies constitute consideration for providing business support services. Revenue authorities argue that such transactions imply a taxable service, attributing consideration to the appellant for facilitating promotional offers. However, the appellant contends that since they neither retain nor profit from these transactions, there’s no valid consideration, thus no liability for service tax.

In assessing the case, CESTAT Mumbai scrutinizes the contractual arrangements between the appellant and card companies. It observes that the appellant merely acts as a conduit for reimbursement, with no retention of amounts received. Moreover, the absence of invoicing to card companies further underscores the lack of consideration from these transactions. This aligns with established legal precedent, as highlighted by the ruling in the case of CCE vs. Edelweiss Financial Services Ltd., where the Supreme Court emphasized the necessity of consideration for levying service tax.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031