Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : CCE, Tirunelveli Vs M/s Ganapathy Mills Co. Ltd. (CESTAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year :
I find that this is a case where the impugned period is from 01.04.05 to 15.09.05. The respondent assessees have taken service tax registration only on 06.12.05 and the very first return has been filed by them on 04.12.06, after a long delay. I also find that in para 2 (iv), there is an allegation of suppression of value of taxable service in the show cause notice dated 12.03.07. In view of the above, the demand cannot be held to be time barred. As the lower appellate authority has not gone into the merits of the case, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded to him for passi...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930