Case Law Details
Case Name : Sumit Devendra Rajani Vs ACIT (Gujarat High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All High Courts Gujarat High Court
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
The grievance which is voiced in the present petition by the assessee is that though deductor employer Amar Remedies Limited had deducted TDS for total Rs.5,86,606/ and for which Form 16 A has been issued by it, department has not given credit of the said TDS to the petitioner assessee deductee and when the assessee has claimed the said deduction, the same has not been granted and demand is raised by issuing notice at Annexure D. Therefore, short question which is posed for consideration of this Court is whether in case the deductor had deducted the T
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.
Hello Sir,
In AY2010-11, my company deducted the TDS from my salary and did not submitted the TDS for my PAN No. I got demand intimation under 143(1)a, 2 years back, which I replied to Jurisdictional AO and written that I have Form-16 available with me which has details of TDS deducted. I submitted the application to correct the demand.
This year, I got the intimation that your refund is adjusted the demand you had for AY2010-11.
So, what should I do next to get it corrected, please help.
Thanks & regards,
Lokesh Bhatt
Yes it is perfectly good judgement. It is the duty & responsibility of the deductor to deposit the tax deducted in to the account of Central Government/Income Tax
Sir
Very good case study…
I have a query
What would be probability in the case of deducted in F/y 13-14 and paid in
F/y 14-15 while payment in challan its mentioned Assessment year as 15-16.
Now how to adjust this amount in the F/Y 13-14 or A/Y 14-15
(shivanand.tandsi@gmail.com)
very good judgement.