This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Section 36(1)(vii) doesn’t require to establish that debts have become bad before writing off
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- DCIT Vs ICICI Bank Limited (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2003-04
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
DCIT Vs ICICI Bank Limited (ITAT Mumbai)
ITAT Mumbai held that post amendment to provisions of section 36(1)(vii) of the Income Tax Act as effective from 1st April 1989, the Act does not require the assessee to establish that the debts have in fact become bad before writing off. Accordingly, addition with regard to disallowance of claim of write off of bad debts duly deleted by CIT(A).
Facts- The assessee has claimed bad debts written off to the tune of Rs.15,03,06,07,093/- u/s. 36(1)(vii) of Income Tax Act, 1961. During assessment proceedings the Assessing Officer disallowed ...






