Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Section 271B penalty quashed as Revenue Misinterprets Gross receipt of agent as Sales

Case Law Details

Case Name
Sh. Nikki Tyagi Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2015-16
Advertisement
Sh. Nikki Tyagi Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) The case of Sh. Nikki Tyagi vs. Income Tax Officer (ITO) addressed a penalty imposed under Section 271B of the Income Tax Act due to a turnover exceeding the threshold requiring an audit. Tyagi, a distributor for Mother Dairy, filed a return under presumptive taxation, declaring income from commission-based transactions without maintaining formal books. The Assessing Officer (AO) determined Tyagi’s total turnover as ₹3.19 crore, which exceeded ₹1 crore, and hence required an audit under Section 44AB. The AO levied a penalty of ₹1.5 lakh for non-audit...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *