Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Smt. Sanjana Mittal Vs DCIT (ITAT Amritsar)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 487/Asr/2018
Date of Judgement/Order : 11/03/2019
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Smt. Sanjana Mittal Vs DCIT (ITAT Amritsar)

In a case where no assessment proceedings are pending on the date of the search and seizure proceedings, the assessment under section 153A can be carried out only on the basis of seized material. In a case, where no incriminating material is unearthed during the course of search proceedings and the assessment proceedings remain unabated as on the said date, no additions can be validly made in the hands of the assessee. Our aforesaid view is fortified by the judgment of the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi in the case of CIT vs. Kabul Chawla (2016) 380 ITR 573 (Del). Apart therefrom, a similar view had also been taken by the Hon’ble High Court of Bombay in the case of CIT vs. Murli Agro Product (ITA No. 36/2009) (Bom) and Commissioner Of Income-tax Vs. Continental Warehousing Corporation (2015) 374 ITR 645 (Bom). In the aforementioned cases, it has been observed by the High Court that as on the date of the initiation of search and seizure proceedings under section 132 of the IT Act, as no proceedings for the year under consideration were pending, therefore, in the absence of any incriminating evidence found during the course of search and seizure proceedings no addition/disallowance could have been made in respect of the unabated assessment of the assessee for the said year. In the backdrop of the aforesaid settled position of the law, we are of the considered view that as on the date of the search and seizure proceedings no assessment proceedings were pending in the case of the assessee, therefore, in the absence of any incriminating material having been found in the course of such proceedings no addition could have been validly made in the hands of the assessee. We thus not being able to persuade ourselves to subscribe to the view taken by the CIT(A) who had upheld the order of the A.O, thus set aside his order and vacate the addition of Rs.1,00,000/- that was sustained by him.

FULL TEXT OF THE ITAT JUDGEMENT

The present appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order passed by the CIT(Appeals)-5, Ludhiana, dated 27.07.2018, which in turn arises from the assessment order passed by the A.O under Sec. 153A r.w.s.143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘I.T. Act’), dated 29.12.2017 for A.Y. 2014-15. The assessee assailing the order of the CIT(A) has raised before us the following grounds of appeal :

1. (a) That having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, Hon’ble CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in confirming the action of Ld. AO in assuming jurisdiction and framing the impugned assessment order u/s 153A/143(3) of the Act is bad in law and against the facts and circumstances of the case and is not sustainable on various legal and factual grounds.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031