Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : M/s Beauty Tax Vs DCIT, ((ITAT Jaipur)
Related Assessment Year : 2007-08
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

The only grievance of the Assessing Officer is that the assessee has failed to produce the party so as to establish genuineness of the transaction and secondly, no payment has been made to the party till the year end. The ld.CIT(A) while confirming the disallowance has stated that though confirmation has been obtained from the party, however, a simple confirmation is not sufficient to establish the fact of purchase without elaborating what more is required from the assessee to justify its claim. Regarding non appearance of the supplier, the assessee has submitte

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio

A Blogger by Passion and a Chartered Accountant by Profession. View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SC upholds validity of e-auction sale conducted by bank SC Interprets the word ‘May’ under Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 Interim Compensation under Section 143A of NI Act Not mandatory: SC WhatsApp Messages Not Conclusive Evidence for Addition: ITAT Chennai Draft MoUs and WhatsApp Chats Alone Don’t Form Binding Contracts: SC View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31