This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
No order of CIT(A) was valid if it failed to comply rule 46A while admitting additional evidences
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- ITO Vs M/s. Theobroma Foods Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2012-13
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
ITO Vs. M/s. Theobroma Foods Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Mumbai)
Conclusion: Since CIT(A) had admitted additional evidences without complying with rule 46A which was fatal to sustaining of appellate order passed by CIT(A), therefore, the matter was restored to CIT(A) for fresh adjudication.
Held: Assessee was engaged in the business of manufacturing and dealing in Food Products. Assessee had taken on lease for a period of five year a new bakery at Bandra . which was extensively renovated to make it operational. Assessee had claimed expenses which were incurred for making cabins, wall partitions, fixing ...
