Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Toyota Kirloskar Motor Pvt Ltd (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2008-09
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

DCIT Vs Toyota Kirloskar Motor Pvt Ltd (ITAT Bangalore)

ITAT Bangalore held that no separate benchmarking of royalty payment required when the margin is accepted to be at arms length price (ALP) by the TPO. Thus, appeal of the revenue dismissed.

Facts- The assessee is a subsidiary of Toyota Motor Corporation, a company incorporated under the laws of Japan. The assessee filed their return of income on 29/09/2008 declaring a total income of Rs. 365,08,48,458/-. Thereafter, the return was processed u/s. 143(1) of the Act. Later on a reference u/s. 92CA of the

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31