Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Balbir Kaur Birdie Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Balbir Kaur Birdie Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Pune has set aside a penalty of ₹20,000 imposed on Balbir Kaur Birdie for non-compliance with notices under Section 142(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The penalty was levied after the assessee failed to respond to notices issued by the Assessing Officer (AO) on March 7, 2021, and March 17, 2021, during the COVID-19 pandemic. The assessee’s representative argued that the lack of response was due to technical difficulties and restricted access to communication facilities. The Tribunal found that the circu

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31