Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Balbir Kaur Birdie Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Balbir Kaur Birdie Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Pune has set aside a penalty of ₹20,000 imposed on Balbir Kaur Birdie for non-compliance with notices under Section 142(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The penalty was levied after the assessee failed to respond to notices issued by the Assessing Officer (AO) on March 7, 2021, and March 17, 2021, during the COVID-19 pandemic. The assessee’s representative argued that the lack of response was due to technical difficulties and restricted access to communication facilities. The Tribunal found that the circumstances con...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930