Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Mr. Paresh S. Shah Vs Income Tax Officer (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 1988- 89
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Under proviso to Rule 24 of the Appellate Tribunal Rules the assessee has to show that there was sufficient cause for his non-appearance and only in the event of proving sufficient cause for non-appearance, ex-parte order passed by the Appellate Tribunal can be restored. It is, therefore, necessary to see as to whether reasons given by the assessee can be considered as sufficient cause for non-appearance. We have carefully gone through the submissions made by the counsel and find that the assessee could not prove sufficient cause for non-appearance on the date fixed for hearing. If Mr. Thankan...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031