This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
ITAT directs CIT(A) to Condone 857-Day Delay considering change in residence & age
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- C. Ramasamy Gounder HUF Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2010-11
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Chennai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
C. Ramasamy Gounder HUF Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Introduction: In a recent case, C. Ramasamy Gounder HUF v. ITO, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Chennai addressed a significant delay in filing an appeal against an assessment order. This article provides a detailed analysis of the case, exploring the reasons for the delay, the tribunal’s decision, and its implications.
Detailed Analysis: The appeal filed by the assessee, C. Ramasamy Gounder HUF, contested an assessment order concerning the assessment year 2010-11. The delay in filing the appeal, amounting to 857 day...
Author Info
