Case Law Details
RELEVANT PARAGRAPHS:
22. The primary function of the Income Tax Act is to bring the income of various kinds into the tax net. The Income Tax authorities are not concerned about the manner or means of acquiring income. The income might have been earned illegally or by resorting to unlawful means. Illegality tainted with the earning has no bearing on its taxability. Income generated by engaging in liquor trade, generally called as res extra commercium, otherwise known as trade in crime, or income earned by way of selling Khadhi products, are one and the same for the tax authorities. The assessee having acquired income by unethical manner or by resorting to acts forbidden by law, cannot be heard to say that the State cannot be a party to such sharing of ill-gotten wealth. In case of allowing such income to escape the tax net would be nothing but a premium or reward to a person for doing an illegal trade. In the event of taxing the income of only those who acquired the same through legal manner, the tendency of those who acquired income by illegal means would increase. It is not possible for the income tax authorities to act like police to prevent the commission of unlawful acts but it is possible for the tax machinery to tax such income. During such process strict rules of evidence are not applicable to the income tax authorities. Those pieces of evidence which are not sufficient in ordinary legal proceedings to prove a particular fact would be sufficient for the tax officials to assess the income of an individual.
23. The income tax Act considers the income earned legally as well as tainted income alike. There is nothing like an illegal income so far as the Tax Collector is concerned. Even if the assessee was prosecuted by Law Enforcing authorities for commission of offence, the income earned by the offender still would be an income liable for assessment. It is not a defence in such cases that the State is also becoming a party to the illegal act by sharing the booty.
24. There was a clear factual finding recorded by the Assessing Authority as well as Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) to the effect that the assessee had indulged in filing bogus TDS certificates and got refund of the amount from the income tax department. It was also the admitted case of the assessee before the income tax department as well as before the Central Bureau of Investigation during the course of investigation into the offence that he had indulged in the act of fabricating TDS certificates and collecting refund from the income tax department. It was only on account of the said factual matrix that the Assessing Officer assessed the income received by the assessee, by getting refund from the income tax department. However, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal without any basis set aside the order of the Assessing Authority as well as Commissioner (Appeals) and as such we are of the considered view that the Tribunal committed a serious error by holding that the booty received by the assessee can under no circumstances be the income of the assessee.
25. In such view of the matter, we do not find any ground to sustain the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. Accordingly the order dated 25.10.2002 is set aside and both the tax cases are
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Well, isn’t this convenient!
One arm of the Govt taxes the underlying transaction amount and collects money; the other arm of the Govt calls it illegal transaction and fines the concerned entity. Isn’t that double benefit?
By this logic, Govt should tax hafta/bribes/…