Explained Jewellery cannot be included while giving benefit of CBDT Instruction related to Unexplained Jewellery

Shri Ram Prakash Mahawar Vs DCIT (ITAT Jaipur) Jewellery supported by Bills & Books of Accounts cannot be called Unexplained The first issue is regarding the addition sustained by the ld. CIT(A) to the tune of Rs. 4,57,404/- on account of unexplained gold jewellery by rejecting the claim of the assessee being acquisition of the said jewellery by way of purchases made from time to time and also recorded in the books of account of the assessee. There is no dispute regarding the fact that jewellery to the extent 343.328 gms. represents the purchases made by the assessee from time to time ...