This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Bad debts written off by non-rural branches u/s. 36(1)(vii) are allowable
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Canara Bank Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2016-17
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Bangalore
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Canara Bank Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore)
ITAT Bangalore held that assessee is eligible to avail deduction of an amount representing actual write off in the books of account of bad debts relating to nonrural/urban advances in terms with section 36(1)(vii), as proviso to the said section would not apply to non-rural advances.
Facts- The assessee filed its return of income on 28.11.2016 declaring total income of Rs.101,07,97,040. The case was selected for scrutiny and assessment u/s. 143(3) was completed on 27.03.2018 assessing total income at Rs.675,71,81,077/- under the regular provisions of the A...




