Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Smt. Harmohinder Kaur v. DCIT (ITAT Amritsar)
Appeal Number : ITA No.568/Asr/2018
Date of Judgement/Order : 16/01/2020
Related Assessment Year : 2009-10
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Smt. Harmohinder Kaur Vs. DCIT (ITAT Amritsar)

The Apex Court in the cases of Central Bureau of Investigation vs. V.C. Shukla (supra) and Common Cause (A registered Society and Ors Vs. Union of India & Ors.(supra) analyzed the position of law with regard to the loose sheets/diary in which some noting has been made by the person other than the persons searched and clearly held that the said document do not have any value in the eyes of law. Further entries in the Diaries, note books and file containing loose sheets paper not in the form of “Books of Accounts” and has held that such entries in loose papers/ sheets are not relevant and not admissible u/s 34 of the Evidence Act. Further as to value of the entries in the books of account, that such statement shall not alone be sufficient evidence to charge any person with liability, even if they are relevant and admissible and that they are only corroborative evidence. Even then independent evidence is necessary as to trustworthiness of those entries which is a requirement to fasten the liability.

On the basis of the aforesaid judgments, we are of the view, diary seized during the survey/search operation, without corroboration, have no authenticity and therefore, cannot be relied upon. Even entry recorded in the diary qua amount of sale was not confirmed from the buyers of the property and without confirmation, question of any assumption or belief that the entry belongs to the assessee did not arise and hence entry found in diary without any corroborative evidence, cannot be made basis of addition. Theauthorities below in the instant case, made the addition only on the basis of surmises, suspicion and guess work. Hence, respectively following the judgments referred above we are unable to sustain the addition made by the Assessing Officer.

FULL TEXT OF THE ITAT JUDGEMENT

This appeal has been preferred by the Assessee/Appellant against the impugned order dated 19.09.2018  passed by the Ld. CIT(A)-5, Ludhiana, u/s 250(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter called as ‘the Act’).

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031