This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
S. 28(va)(a) – Amount received for “not carrying out any activity in relation to any business” taxable only from A.Y. 2003-04
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- ACIT Vs. Dr. B.V. Raju (ITAT Hyderabad)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2000- 01
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Hyderabad
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
ACIT Vs. Dr. B.V. Raju (ITAT Hyderabad Special Bench)- What was transferred by Mr.B.V.Raju under the agreement dt. 27.10.1999 for which he was paid a sum of Rs. 11 crores by ICL. One should also read the above covenants in the non-compete agreement in the light of the preamble to the agreement which gives the background as to why the agreement was being entered into.
The preamble to the non-compete agreement refers to the fact that Mr.B.V.Raju during the course of his employment with Cement Corporation of India, RCL and SVCL acquired a corpus of knowledge, skill, expertise, and experience rela...
