Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs Goenka Trading (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ACIT Vs Goenka Trading (ITAT Mumbai) The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Mumbai, in a consolidated order addressing appeals for Assessment Years 2015-16, 2016-17, and 2017-18, ruled in favor of Goenka Trading, allowing the company to write off bad debts without providing explicit proof of their irrecoverability. The case centered on a significant bad debt claim of Rs. 13 crore, stemming from trading losses incurred due to the National Spot Exchange Limited (NSEL) crisis. The Assessing Officer (AO) had disallowed the claim, citing the lack of evidence of recovery efforts and the nature of ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

A Blogger by Passion and a Chartered Accountant by Profession. View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SC Rejects Review Liberty as Subsequent Judgments Are Not Grounds for Review Gauhati HC Quashes GST Cancellation as Order Contained No Reasons No TDS Default Where Court Barred Deduction: Kerala HC No TDS Default for Following High Court Order: ITAT Agra ITAT Delhi Deletes Demonetisation Addition for Cash Sales Already Offered to Tax View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930