Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs Goenka Trading (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

ACIT Vs Goenka Trading (ITAT Mumbai)

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Mumbai, in a consolidated order addressing appeals for Assessment Years 2015-16, 2016-17, and 2017-18, ruled in favor of Goenka Trading, allowing the company to write off bad debts without providing explicit proof of their irrecoverability. The case centered on a significant bad debt claim of Rs. 13 crore, stemming from trading losses incurred due to the National Spot Exchange Limited (NSEL) crisis. The Assessing Officer (AO) had disallowed the claim, citing the lack of evidence of recovery efforts and th

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio

A Blogger by Passion and a Chartered Accountant by Profession. View Full Profile

My Published Posts

No adverse GST Order Without Personal Hearing: Allahabad HC Canara Bank Wins ITAT Appeal: Section 115JB Not Applicable Bombay HC Declares Assessment Order Invalid for Exceeding Section 144C(13) Deadline Section 115JB not applicable to banking companies: ITAT Bangalore Bombay HC Criticizes ITAT for Delayed Order, Restores Rectification Plea View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
April 2025
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930