Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Nitin M Dhandhukia Vs C.C.E. (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Nitin M Dhandhukia Vs C.C.E. (CESTAT Ahmedabad)

CESTAT Ahmedabad held that imposing penalty under rule 209A against the person who is only involved in maintaining the accounts of the company is unjustified and unsustainable in law.

Facts- The officer of Central Excise Department visited the factory premises of M/s. Raipur Manufacturing Co. Ltd, Saraspur Gate, Ahmedabad on 13.04.1998. The department formed a view that assessee namely M/s. Raipur Manufacturing Co. Ltd has not valued the captively consum

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31