Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Nitin M Dhandhukia Vs C.C.E. (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Nitin M Dhandhukia Vs C.C.E. (CESTAT Ahmedabad) CESTAT Ahmedabad held that imposing penalty under rule 209A against the person who is only involved in maintaining the accounts of the company is unjustified and unsustainable in law. Facts- The officer of Central Excise Department visited the factory premises of M/s. Raipur Manufacturing Co. Ltd, Saraspur Gate, Ahmedabad on 13.04.1998. The department formed a view that assessee namely M/s. Raipur Manufacturing Co. Ltd has not valued the captively consumed yarn properly as they have failed to include the expenses such as bonus, gratuity, interest...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930