Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Himalaya Drug Company Vs Commissioner of Central Tax (Karnataka High Court)
Appeal Number : Writ Petition No.10142 of 2021 (T-TAR)
Date of Judgement/Order : 08/09/2022
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Himalaya Drug Company Vs Commissioner of Central Tax (Karnataka High Court)

Karnataka High Court held that petitioner had made out valid and sufficient ground/cause to condone the delay in preferring the appeal before the appellate Authority. Accordingly, exercising power under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the condonation of delay was granted.

Facts-

It is alleged that vide the impugned order, the Appellate Authority declined to condone the delay in preferring the appeal and accordingly, dismissed the appeal as barred by limitation.

It is contended that the inability and omission on the part of the petitioner to prefer the appeal before the Appellate Authority within the prescribed period was due to bonafide reasons, unavoidable circumstances and sufficient cause as detailed in the application for condensation of delay as well as in the present petition.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031