All the dues including the statutory dues owed to the Central Government, any State Government or any local authority, if not part of the Company’s approved resolution plan, shall stand extinguished and no proceedings in respect of such dues for the period prior to the date the Adjudicating Authority was granting its approval under Section 31 could be continued.
In present facts of the case, the Hon’ble Appellate Tribunal held that Liquidation is the last resort and this programme of homebuyers needs some calibration and proper evaluation.
In present facts of the case the Hon’ble NCLAT have held that under Rule 11 of the NCLT Rules, 2016 they have power to grant of withdrawal of cases. It was also observed that prime objective of the Code is not recovery, but revival
Martin S.K. Golla Vs Wig Associates Pvt. Ltd. (NCLAT) The Resolution Plan of Mr. Wig who was undisputedly a related party, was accepted on 20.04.2018 in the 4th COC (Annexure – 16 – Page 248). Section 29A hits the eligibility of the persons to submit a Resolution Plan if a person falls in any of […]
Jayanta Banerjee Vs Shashi Agarwal (NCLAT Delhi) In the instant case, we find that the IRP/RP had formed the Committee of Creditors based on the Financial Creditors’ submission of claims even without verification, despite that one of the financial creditors had explicitly requested to defer the e-voting on the resolution of the 5th CoC dated […]
Executive Engineer of Uttar Gujrat VIJ Company Ltd. Vs Devang P Samapat RP of M/s. Kanoovi Foods Pvt. Ltd. (NCLAT Delhi) If the electricity consumption was for manufacturing and output of the Biscuits which is the normal operation of the Corporate Debtor, in that case dues arising from such supply of electricity during moratorium would […]
Once a resolution plan is duly approved by the Adjudicating Authority under subsection (1) of Section 31, the claims as provided in the resolution plan shall stand frozen and will be binding on the Corporate Debtor and its employees, members, creditors, including the Central Government, any State Government or any local authority, guarantors and other stakeholders.
MSME certificate was required to take benefit of Micro Small and Medium Enterprises (MSME) under Section 240A of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code and it was not necessary to pursue Section 230 of the Companies Act at the stage of Liquidation, the same not being part of Procedure of IBC when the Corporate Debtor was in Liquidation.
Orator Marketing Pvt. Ltd. Vs Samtex Desinz Pvt. Ltd. (NCLAT Delhi) Synopsis states and it is argued that it being related party transaction, the money was to be utilized by the Respondent for day to day activities and to develop business, and that same was consideration of time value of money. We are unable to […]
The NCLAT observed that the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, General Circular dated August 21, 2019 has clarified that section 232(6) of Companies Act, 2013 enables the companies in question to choose and state in the scheme an ‘appointed date’. This date may be a specific calendar date or may be tied to the occurrence of an event such as grant of license by a competent authority or fulfilment of any preconditions agreed upon by the parties, or meeting any other requirement as agreed upon between the parties, etc., which are relevant to the scheme.
