In Re Vinod Tarachand Agrawal Resolution Profession of Mayfair Leisures Limited (NCLAT Delhi) The Ld counsel for the appellant has stated that the exclusion of 90 days from the CIRP of the CD would save the company from ‘Liquidation’. It was also pointed out by the ld. Counsel that there was a ‘Prospective Resolution Applicant’ […]
Ravi Iron Ltd. Vs Jia Lal Kishori Lal (NCLAT Delhi) When the Application under Section 9 of the IBC Code comes with date of default and no other reasons given in the Application or any details for extension of limitation, we see no ground to hold that Application was well within time. The submission of […]
Reduction of Capital’ under Section 66 of the Companies Act, 2013 is a ‘Domestic Affair’ of a Company in which, ordinarily, a Tribunal will not interfere because of the reason that it is a ‘majority decision’ which prevails.
Niew taken by NC:LT in Beacon Trusteeship Limited is not inconsonance with Section 7 read with Section 238 of ‘I&B Code’. Financial Creditor has full right to initiate action under Section 7 for non-payment of dues.
Dheeraj Wadhawan Vs Administrator, Dewan Housing Finance Corporation Limited (NCLAT Delhi) Facts- The Company Appeal is filed by Appellant Dheeraj Wadhawan, erstwhile Promoter/Director of DHFL, against the Order dated 28 April 2020 in the Miscellaneous Application being numbered as MA 518 of 2020 in Company Petition (IB) No. 4258/2019 under Section 60(5) of the Insolvency […]
Kiran Shah Vs Enforcement Directorate (NCLAT Delhi) In so far as anyone aggrieved against any decision or order of the ‘Adjudicating Authority’ of the PMLA, then it is open to him to prefer an Appeal before the Appellate Tribunal, PMLA by resorting to the relevant provision(s) of the ‘Prevention of the Money Laundering Act, 2002’. […]
Association of aggrieved Workmen Association of aggrieved Workmen of of Jet Airways (India) Limited Vs Jet Airways (India) Ltd. (NCLAT Delhi) Facts- The only question involved is whether the appellant is entitled for a copy of resolution plan or any part of it. Notably, the resolution plan is already approved by the Adjudicating Authority. Conclusion- Resolution plan […]
In the SICOM Limited vs. Sundaresh Bhat case, the Appellant’s U/s. 60(5) Application was accepted. Learn why Section 42’s limitation doesn’t apply.
Essjay Ericsson Private Limited Vs Frontline (NCR) Business Solutions Pvt. Ltd. (NCLAT Delhi) When the limitation has extended by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the orders noted above, for a period covering extension of limitation neither application is required nor there is any discretion of Court or Tribunal to consider sufficiency of delay. We are […]
Kanchan Nanubhai Desai Personal Guarantor Vs Finquest Financial Solutions Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. (NCLAT, Delhi) There cannot be any dispute with the statutory scheme as contained in Section 97 that when Application is filed by the Resolution Professional under Section 95, the Adjudicating Authority shall direct the Board within seven days of the date of […]
