ITAT held that if sales are not disputed and there is no discrepancy between purchases and declared sales, addition should be restricted to bring gross profit on alleged bogus purchases in line with other genuine purchases.
ACIT Vs Merchant Agri Global Private Limited – Detailed analysis of Mumbai ITAT’s decision regarding adhoc disallowance of expenses without rejecting books of account. Full text of the order provided.
Shanno Mohammed Yusuf Warsi Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) The case of Shanno Mohammed Yusuf Warsi Vs Income Tax Officer (ITO) at the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Mumbai revolves around the taxation of long-term capital gains (LTCG) from penny stock transactions, specifically involving shares of Essar (India) Ltd. The central question is whether the assessee […]
Assessee had issued share application money and subsequently allotted shares which showed that the transactions were genuine and there was no material brought on record by tax authorities that the assessee had benefited from round-tripping, therefore, ITAT had deleted the addition made u/s 68.
ITAT found that the original Form 35A was filed within the stipulated time and ruled that the correction made thereafter should not be considered late.
Analysis of Kundal Raghubir Bhandari Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) case reveals flaws in assessment based on unverified third-party statements. Learn more about this significant legal ruling.
Mumbai ITAT rules in Lalita Troy Caeiro Vs ITO case that assessment can’t be reopened beyond 4 years if there’s full disclosure by assessee. Detailed analysis and conclusion provided.
Explore the detailed analysis of JS Capital LLC Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) regarding the offsetting of Short Term Capital Loss (STCL) against Short Term Capital Gain (STCG) under section 70(2) of the Income Tax Act.
Appellant’s bank statements confirm full payment, complying with Section 56(2)(x)(b)(B). ITAT deletes addition of Rs. 60.1 Lakhs. Detailed analysis & conclusion.
In the case of Pukhraj Nathmal Jain Vs ITO, ITAT Mumbai deletes addition u/s 68 of Income Tax Act, as the source for deposits made during demonetisation period was substantiated.
