ITAT Mumbai restores Ivan Santosh Fernandes’ appeal, citing Covid-based extension, for reassessment on AY 2012-13. Penalty appeal also directed for fresh review.
ITAT Mumbai dismisses tax appeal against Old Girtonians Association due to CBDT’s revised monetary limits under Circular No. 9/2024 for appeals below ₹60 lakh.
The onus was on assessee to demonstrate the extent of such assets which could be explained as having been acquired through funds which had been disclosed to the Department.
Held that reserve arising out of amalgamation is capital in nature and cannot be treated as revenue under the ambit of section 28(iv) of the Act. CIT (A) is correct in holding that capital reserve cannot be treated as an Income u/s 28(iv) of the Act.
ITAT Mumbai held that assessee is not entitled for concession rate of tax of 20% provided under section 112(1) of the Income Tax Act on the short term capital gain computed under section 50 of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Mumbai held that capital gain arising out of sale of shares not taxable in the hands of foreign company since holding is less than 10% hence Article 14(4) of DTAA between India and Spain cannot be applied.
The ITAT Mumbai remands the case of Ashok Ghelabhai Patel for fresh examination after the assessee failed to provide adequate evidence for claimed expenses.
ITAT Mumbai quashes penalty under Section 271(1)(c) for Vijay Jewellers, citing estimated additions for bogus purchases. No concealment or inaccurate details found.
ITAT Mumbai held that depreciation under section 32 of the Income Tax Act on the right to collect toll on the roads developed on BOT basis is not eligible.
CIT(A) held that as per Section 5 of the Act , if an individual is residing for more than 183 days in India he would be considered as Resident in India and his entire global income would be taxable in India. Being aggrieved, the present appeal is filed.
