ITAT Mumbai held that adjustment of disallowance of deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) is not permissible adjustment under section 143(1) of the Act. Accordingly, order of CIT(A) set aside and deduction u/s. 80P(2)(d) allowed.
ITAT Mumbai rules in favor of B. Braun Medical India, deleting ₹2 Cr addition u/s 68, citing it as an advance payment, not unexplained credit.
ITAT Mumbai upholds CIT(A) order favoring Fitrite Packers, dismissing Revenue’s appeal over disallowances related to penalty and contingent liability.
ITAT Mumbai held that sale of Dangerous Goods Regulations manuals could not be characterised as ‘royalty’ within the meaning of Article 12(3) of the India-Canada tax treaty. Accordingly, addition towards sale of manuals is deleted.
ITAT Mumbai held that CIT(A) rightly deleted addition towards bogus purchases since assessee proved genuineness of purchases by submitting various details/ documents. Accordingly, appeal of the revenue dismissed.
ITAT Mumbai upholds addition under Section 68 of ₹4.89 Cr. Vijay Maneklal Bhansali’s appeal dismissed, citing lack of evidence on commodity transactions.
ITAT Mumbai dismisses a revenue appeal in ITO vs. Gajadharprasad Nathai Pal as the tax effect falls below the CBDT threshold of ₹60 lakh.
ITAT Mumbai invalidates reassessment in Ramlal G Suthar vs. ITO due to improper approval under Section 151(ii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Read the full summary.
ITAT Mumbai ruled on TVF Fund Ltd’s appeal regarding tax loss set-off under DTAA. Key issues include carry-forward losses, taxability, and judicial precedents.
ITAT Mumbai held that disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act unjustified when reimbursement of expenses is considered as receipts in total income and tax is paid on the same therefore no disallowance in terms of proviso to section 201.
