Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Supreme Holdings And Hospitality (India) Limited (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

DCIT Vs Supreme Holdings And Hospitality (India) Limited (ITAT Mumbai)

Conclusion: Addition made under Section 68 for unexplained cash credit was not valid as assessee had provided sufficient evidence to prove the genuineness of unsecured loans received from various lenders and lenders were reputable entities with a clean track record, and the transactions were conducted through proper banking channels. Mere AO’s suspicion without any concrete evidence was not enough to justify the addition.

Held: In pursuance of search, notice u/s.153A wa

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
April 2025
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930