In a recent judgement, ITAT Delhi condoned a 379-day delay in the case of Dominic Savio Dasilva Vs CIT, caused due to miscommunication of Income Tax notices by a chartered accountant to a non-resident Indian.
The ITAT Delhi quashed a notice issued to a deceased person, stating that Section 292BB of the Income Tax Act is inapplicable if the assessee didn’t participate in reassessment proceedings.
The ITAT in Delhi has directed a re-adjudication in the case of Kishan Singh & Associates Vs ITO involving an addition made by AO under sections 69A and 115BBE of the Income Tax Act due to non-filing of ROI.
Explore the key aspects and implications of the case Avaya International Sales Ltd Vs ACIT, wherein ITAT Delhi directed a fresh examination of the taxability of support/maintenance services under the India-Ireland DTAA.
ITAT held that the assessing officer’s use of Section 154 before 12.10.2022 to disallow EPF and ESI contributions was not justified, as the issue was debatable and there were conflicting views and such views.
During the scrutiny assessment proceedings, the AO made an estimated addition to the household drawings as the assessee did not provide a plausible reply to justify the expenses considering their family’s constitution and standard of living.
ITAT Delhi held that TDS not deductible u/s 195(1) on the reimbursement of mobilization and demobilization cost to the holding company. Accordingly, disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) unsustainable.
ITAT Delhi held that addition towards payment of stamp duty in cash is not sustainable as source of income such as tuition income, interest income and rental income which is converting to in cash since 20 to 25 years and she is continuously filing her return of income with the department.
ITAT Delhi held that the reassessment notice issued under Section 148 is clearly time barred owing to non compliance conditions prescribed on 1st proviso to Section 147 of the Act. Accordingly, re-assessment proceeding is illegal and without jurisdiction.
ITAT Delhi case where Catvision Ltd was wrongfully demanded Dividend Distribution Tax by the AO despite timely payments.
