Delhi High Court held that the notification dated 29th January 2020, retrospectively revoking the benefit under the Merchandise Exports from India Scheme (MEIS) in respect of Flexible Intermediate Bulk Container bags, with effect from 7th March 2019, is unjustified and unsustainable in law.
Delhi High Court decision on Subodh Gupta vs ACIT. Disruption in video conference hearing leads to setting aside assessment orders. Fresh hearings directed.
Delhi High Court held that as per the scheme of PMLA that power to issue summons u/s. 50 of PMLA is different from the power to arrest u/s. 19 of PMLA. Further, issuance of summons to join investigation and give some evidence or document to the investigation agency cannot be presumed to culminate into the arrest of person being so summoned.
Delhi High Court held that in the absence of a conferral of any power upon the Tax Research Unit (TRU), it cannot issue clarification regarding the classification of polypropylene woven and non-woven bags under the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. Accordingly, Circular dated 31 December 2018 issued by TRU is quashed and set aside.
Delhi High Court held that Delhi Gymkhana Club is exigible to Luxury tax on activity of providing residential accommodation by a hotelier for monetary consideration under the Delhi Tax on Luxuries Act, 1996.
Delhi High Court held that while determining compensation for injuries suffered in the road accident only documentary evidence in form of Income Tax Return in support of the claim of income is sufficient.
Explore the Delhi High Court judgment in PCIT vs. Bhilwara Energy Ltd, covering condonation of delay, key issues, and disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act.
Delhi High Court held that income of the deceased, and not taxable income of the deceased, is relevant while determining loss of dependency. Thus, merely because certain allowances are not taxable in nature, the same would not warrant their deduction from the annual income of the deceased for the purposes of determining the compensation.
Explore the Delhi High Court order in Fada Trading vs. Income Tax Ward 9(1). Detailed analysis of the self-assessment tax deposit issue and the CBDT directions for resolution.
Delhi High Court held that denial of refund claim of accumulated Input Tax Credit (ITC) due to inverted duty structure merely because of incorrect classification of goods by the supplier is unjustified and unsustainable in law.
