Subramanya Karthik Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) ITAT held that decisions cited by the learned Counsel for the assessee proceed on the assumption that the disallowance of employees’ share of PF and ESI paid beyond the due dates under relevant law has been made only under section 143(1)(a)(iv) of the Act, while in the intimation under […]
ITAT Bangalore held that disallowance merely considering the provisions of section 144C(8) of the Income Tax Act without verification of details furnished by the assessee is unsustainable in law.
Order passed u/s.263 is invalid and shall be deemed to have never been issued if it does not contain the DIN
Toyota Kirloskar Motor (P) Ltd Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore) The Appellant submits the in its own case for AY 2003-04, the Honourable Bangalore Tribunal has accepted that TP adjustment has to restricted to AE transactions. Further, in Appellants own case for AY 2013-14 [ITA No.2016/Bang/2018, dated 18.08.2021], the Honourable Bangalore Tribunal has upheld the action […]
Karnataka Vikas Grameena Bank Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore) Assessee is a regional rural bank and formed with the merging of four regional banks into a single regional rural bank. As per the Regional Rural Bank Act 1976 notification dated 12/09/2005, the shareholders were Central Government, State Government and sponsored Bank. The case was reopened on […]
ITAT Bangalore held that addition of Special Economic Zone books profits while computing books profits under section 115JB of the Income Tax Act is unsustainable in law in terms of Special Bench of Delhi Tribunal decision in the case of ACIT vs. Vireet Investment (P) Ltd.
ITAT Bangalore held that it is not necessary for assessee to establish that the debt, in fact has become irrecoverable; it enough if bad debt is written off as irrecoverable in the hooks of accounts of assessee.
Chase Security Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) Section 36(1)(va) and Section 43B(b) operate on totally different equilibriums and have different parameters for due dates, i.e., employee’s contribution is linked to payment before the due dates specified in the respective Acts and employer’s contribution is linked to payment before the due dates specified in the respective Acts […]
ITAT held that Investment referred in Section 142A pertains to Investment made by assessee in construction of property and not investment made in purchase of ready built house property.
ITAT Bangalore held that disallowance under section 14A of the Income Tax Act is restricted to the amount of exempt income earned by the assessee.
