ITAT Raipur permits assessee to withdraw a duplicate tax appeal filed due to a technical error, dismissing the case as withdrawn.
ITAT Bangalore remands case concerning cash deposits during demonetization, directing the AO to re-assess the addition u/s 69A after considering CBDT circulars and granting the assessee a fair hearing.
ITAT Delhi dismisses Revenue’s appeal in ACIT vs Hindukush Construction Pvt. Ltd. (AY 2016-17) due to low tax effect under CBDT Circular No. 09/2024.
ITAT Mumbai allows Hotel Deepak’s appeal, holding that a survey statement u/s 133A can’t be the sole basis for income addition when discrepancies exist and expenses are substantiated. The tribunal cites a prior similar ruling.
In the matter aforementioned ITAT deleted addition made on account of Client Code Modification after observing that assessee utilized its own funds to conduct transactions on NSEL platform and the profits from such transactions have already been offered to tax.
ITAT Mumbai rules that a Section 143(1) adjustment becomes infructuous once a regular assessment under Section 143(3) is completed, especially if the returned income is accepted as the assessed income.
ITAT Ahmedabad condones a 340-day delay in an appeal on unexplained cash deposits under Section 69A and remands the case for fresh adjudication.
ITAT Mumbai quashes CIT(A)’s order dismissing HPCL’s appeal, citing non-compliance with prior tribunal directives. The case involves interest on refunds and the now-defunct Vivad Se Viswas Scheme. The tribunal mandates a fresh hearing on the merits of the case.
Key ITAT Delhi decision in ACIT Vs Hella India Lighting Ltd.: Analysis of Section 69C addition, expense disallowance, and foreign exchange loss claims for AY 2017-18.
ITAT Chennai held that although the assessee company was following the mercantile system of accounting, only real income could be brought to tax. Hypothetical income cannot be taxed. Hence, appeal of revenue dismissed.
