This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
MRTP Commission can modify or revoke its interim order if it thinks that such a direction could only be considered at time of finally deciding complaint
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- A.B.N.A. Vs Managing Director, U.P.S.I.D.C. Ltd., Kanpur (Supreme Court of India)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- Supreme Court of India
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
A.B.N.A.
v/s.
Managing Director, U.P.S.I.D.C. Ltd., Kanpur
Special Leave Petition(c) Nos. 16116-16117 of 2010†
May 8, 2012
ORDER
A.K. Patnaik, J. – These are petitions under Article 136 of the Constitution for leave to appeal against the order dated 04.03.2009 of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission, New Delhi, (for short ‘the MRTP Commission’) in Review Application No.16 of 2007 and the order dated 05.01.2010 of the Competition Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi, in Review Application No.06 of 2009.
2. The facts very briefly are that...
