Read all latest corporate law news, articles, notifications & circular on Taxguru.in. News on laws related to DIPP Labour Minimum Wages Gratuity PF Arbitration Negotiable instrument Essential Commodities SRFAESI Competition Act Corporate Law
Corporate Law : A Power of Attorney authorizes someone to act on your behalf. Learn its types, revocation rules, legal limits, and applicable stam...
Corporate Law : Explore the life and work of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, from his early struggles against caste discrimination to his pivotal role in draft...
Corporate Law : Treaty-based protections for foreign investors, rooted in International Investment Agreements (IIAs) like Bilateral Investment Tre...
Corporate Law : There’s a lack of real space to unpack the inappropriateness of certain aspects of IBBI’s 2025 reforms is difficult: the refor...
Corporate Law : Foreign arbitral bodies like SIAC, ICC, and ICSID resolve investment conflicts. Challenges of cost, consistency, and transparency ...
Corporate Law : IBBI's First Appellate Authority dismisses Ravinder Aggarwal's RTI appeal seeking details on MSA Developers' resolution plan imple...
Corporate Law : India's IBC shows significant recovery rates. 8,000+ CIRPs initiated, with 3,485 debtors rescued. Learn about amendments & reforms...
Corporate Law : EPFO adds 15 banks for employer contributions, expanding to 32 banks. The move aims to enhance efficiency and reduce transactional...
Corporate Law : DoT and MHA take steps to curb telecom frauds, block spoofed calls, and promote cybercrime reporting through NCRP and Sanchar Saat...
Corporate Law : CBDT signed 174 Advance Pricing Agreements in FY 2024-25, including a record number of bilateral agreements, to improve transfer p...
Corporate Law : Madras High Court held that advocates shall maintain professional integrity and do not engage in acts that could mislead the publi...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court held that as there was no privity of contract between the concerned parties therein, no ‘deficiency’ would arise...
Corporate Law : NCLT Chandigarh held that since resolution plan in respect of Nav Jyoti Agro Foods Private Limited meets requirement of section 30...
Corporate Law : NCLT Mumbai held that the Advance received by the Corporate Debtor against future supply of goods is an Operational Debt. Petition...
Corporate Law : Karnataka High Court held that total consideration under composition scheme doesn’t include amount received from customer toward...
Corporate Law : IRDAI warns Heritage Health TPA for non-compliance in claims handling. Advisory issued to follow regulations in health insurance c...
Corporate Law : NPCI updates NACH mandate cancellation, enabling any sponsor bank to process. Banks/corporates responsible for data accuracy and c...
Corporate Law : India's Commerce Department instructs SEZ Development Commissioners to submit detailed monthly performance reports by the 9th of e...
Corporate Law : IRDAI fines Flipkart ₹1.06 crore for insurance regulation breaches, including ISNP misuse and operating without valid registrati...
Corporate Law : DPIIT allows Indian companies to issue bonus shares to existing non-resident shareholders in FDI-prohibited sectors, with no chang...
Provisions of RERA are prospective in nature. The penalty under Sections 18, 38, 59, 60, 61, 63 and 64 is to be levied on account of contravention of provisions of RERA, prospectively and not retrospectively. These provisions, therefore, cannot be said to be violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 20(1) and 300-A of the Constitution of India.
The business entity such as Proprietary Concerns/ Partnership Firms/ LLP/ AOP/ HUF/ Companies, etc. has to follow various statutory compliances monthly/ quarterly/ half-yearly/ annually, as the case may be. For the benefit of all and timely compliances related to various laws applicable to be followed for the December month(November Commitments) are listed as below:
It has come to the notice that some of the field offices have not yet completed the task of Compliance Audit of the Exempted/ Relaxed Establishments falling under their territorial jurisdiction by a special drive. Therefore, it is again reiterated to complete this exercise by 31st December, 2017 positively and report to Head Office by e-mail in the format annexed herewith by 08.01.18 through Addl. CPFC of the concerned zone.
Whereas, for the case of filing online registration application and for the benefit of consumer it was necessary to distinguish and/or identity whether such Promoter is the land owner, investor OR is the one who has actually obtained/ obtaining the building permissions for carrying out the construction and has been/ is in fact carrying out construction.
The reason for imposing costs on the petitioner is that on perusal of the translation filed by the petitioner, we find that the impugned judgment does not make out any head and tail. It is difficult to read much less to understand as to what the judgment contains.
The NCLAT held that that in the absence of any provision in IBC, the Limitation Act, 1963 would not be applicable to initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process. The NCLAT further observed:
The above referred circular details the process for updating project details and revising/ correcting information with respect to registered projects & Agents. The circular also provides details of fields, in Annexure A and B, which are editable by the promoters themselves and those that can be requested to MahaRERA for revision/ correction.
The provisions of online filing of returns in the prescribed proforma shall also be applicable to establishment which have been granted exemption by an order of the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner for individual employees under the provisions of Paragraph 27 of the Employees’ Provident Funds Scheme, 1952.
A facility has been provided to the members to merge their earlier PF Accounts to the current PF account so that EPFO may help them in the integration of all these PF accounts in the Current UAN activated PF account.
A Limited Liability Partnership combines the advantages of both the Company and Partnership into a single form of organization. In an LLP one partner is not responsible or liable for another partner’s misconduct or negligence. In an LLP, all partners have limited liability for each individual’s protection within the partnership, similar to that of the shareholders of a limited company.
