Read all latest corporate law news, articles, notifications & circular on Taxguru.in. News on laws related to DIPP Labour Minimum Wages Gratuity PF Arbitration Negotiable instrument Essential Commodities SRFAESI Competition Act Corporate Law
Corporate Law : Article examines LLM risks in tax practice and outlines a framework for verification, confidentiality, citation checks, and profes...
Corporate Law : A UAE visa or company does not establish tax residency. Tax depends on residence tests, income, management, and supporting evidenc...
Corporate Law : P&H HC refused regular bail under the UAPA, holding prima facie material linked the accused to the alleged conspiracy and funding ...
Corporate Law : Article examines persistent exam paper leaks, their causes, impact on students, and suggests technology, stricter enforcement, eth...
Corporate Law : Explains how email exchanges may contribute to contracts under Indian law, covering the Indian Contract Act, IT Act, 2000, and Bha...
Corporate Law : PIB outlines the FCRA framework, proposed 2026 Amendment Bill and notified Rules covering registration, reporting, asset vesting a...
Corporate Law : PIB outlines the FCRA 2026 Amendment Bill and revised Rules, covering registration, reporting, asset vesting, renewal, investigati...
Corporate Law : DRI dismantled an alleged Mephedrone manufacturing facility in Ankleshwar, seized drugs, chemicals and ₹21 lakh, and arrested th...
Corporate Law : MSME Ministry outlines CGTMSE measures including ₹10 crore guarantee ceiling, reduced AGF, enhanced coverage and awareness initi...
Corporate Law : Government outlines FTAs, Export Promotion Mission, e-commerce export reforms and logistics initiatives to diversify export market...
Corporate Law : HC upheld quashing of a vague wilful defaulter notice but allowed fresh proceedings under the RBI Master Circular with proper part...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court dissolved marriage under Article 142 citing irretrievable breakdown after over a decade of separation, while allowin...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court held that IBC moratorium against corporate and personal guarantors does not bar recovery proceedings against a princ...
Corporate Law : Bombay High Court dismissed a challenge to deemed conveyance under Section 11 of MOFA, holding the second application was maintain...
Corporate Law : SC held Section 35 of the Stamp Act did not bar secondary evidence where the 1988 agreement was not chargeable with stamp duty at ...
Corporate Law : IRDAI directs insurers to submit SCNs within 7 days, additional documents within 3 days, and clear pending requests within 30 days...
Corporate Law : Instruction No. 124 dated July 23, 2026 directs RFID seals for SEZ export containers under valid LEOs to ensure uniform acceptance...
Corporate Law : Notification S.O. 4049(E) amends the PMLA Special Courts notification, designating additional courts and jurisdiction in Gujarat f...
Corporate Law : DPIIT Press Note No. 3 of 2026 permits inventory-based e-commerce for exports of goods made in India, effective from the date of t...
Corporate Law : Government notifies the Employees’ Provident Funds Scheme, 2026, replacing the 1952 Scheme and introducing updated EPF, enrolmen...
Har Kishan Vs President Secretariatt (Delhi High Court) On a query from the Petitioner, it is revealed that the Petitioner’s daughter had also applied for an appointment as Multi-Tasking Staff, in the Presidential Estate, Rashtrapati Bhawan. However, this fact does not find any mention in the present writ petition. A perusal of the writ petition […]
To give a fillip to insurance penetration and to facilitate innovations in the insurance sector, especially those triggered by technology the IRDAI notified the IRDAI (Regulatory Sandbox) Regulations, 2019 on 26th July, 2019. The Regulations are valid for a period of 2 years from the date of publication in the official gazette.
Conformity to standard and compulsory use of Standard Mark.- The goods or articles specified in the column (1) of the Table shall conform to the corresponding Indian Standard specified in column (2) of the said Table and shall bear the Standard Mark under a licence from the Bureau as per Scheme-I of Schedule-II of the Bureau of Indian Standards (Conformity Assessment) Regulations, 2018:
State of Odisha & Ors. Vs Sunanda Mahakuda (Supreme Court of India) Looking to the period of delay and the casual manner in which the application has been worded, we consider appropriate impose costs of Rs.25,000/- to be deposited with the Supreme Court Advocates On Record Welfare Fund. The amount be deposited in four weeks. […]
Sanjeev Mishra Vs Disciplinary Authority (Rajasthan High Court) In the present digital world, work place for employees working in the Bank and who have earlier worked in the same Branch and later on shifted to different branches which may be situated in different States has to be treated completely as one work place on a […]
In the matter of Mr. Girish Siriram Juneja, Insolvency Professional (IP) under Regulation 11 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Professional) Regulations, 2016
Professional Misconduct if an IP accepts assignment as RP in CIRP after 31.12.2019 without holding a valid AFA DC finds that an order has been passed against Mr. Bhat on 1st December, 2020 by the Disciplinary Committee of IPA for accepting assignment as RP after 31st December, 2019 without holding a valid AFA in the […]
Accepting assignment as IRP after 31.12.2019 without holding a valid AFA- No misconduct if consent given prior to 1.1.2020 The DC finds that an order by the Disciplinary Committee of the IPA dated 1st December 2020 has been passed disposing the SCN issued by IPA dated 31st August 2020 to Mr. Laddha, on the issue […]
IREO Grace Realtech Pvt. Ltd. Vs Abhishek Khanna & Others (Supreme Court of India) Section 14 of the 1986 Act empowers the Consumer Fora to redress the deficiency of service by issuing directions to the Builder, and compensate the consumer for the loss or injury caused by the opposite party, or discontinue the unfair or […]
The arbitration agreement would not be rendered invalid, un-enforceable or non-existent, even if the substantive contract is not admissible in evidence, or cannot be acted upon on account of non-payment of Stamp Duty.
