Case Law Details
Sh. Nitin Singhania Vs Commissioner of Central Tax GST (Delhi High Court)
The Hon’ble High Court, Delhi in the matter of M/s SH. NITIN SINGHANIA v. COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX GST, DELHI (EAST)[W.P.(C) 10389/2022 & CM No.29962/2022 dated July 29, 2022] set aside the order passed by the department in order to attach the bank account of the assessee for more than one year and held that as per section 83 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (“the CGST Act”) the prescribed time limit for provisional attachment is one year.
Facts:
The Central Goods and Services Tax, Delhi East (“the Respondent”) vide order dated March 31,2021 (“the Impugned Order”) provisionally attached the bank accounts and immovable property of M/s SH. Nitin Singhania (“the Petitioner”). Being aggrieved by the Impugned Order, the Petitioner, filed present writ petition with a prayer to direction the Respondent to quash and set-aside the Impugned Order issued by the Respondent in the interest of justice.
Petitioner’s Contention:
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Author Bio
