These regulations may be called the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Stock Brokers) (Amendment) Regulations, 2023.
These regulations may be called the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Change in Control in Intermediaries) (Amendment) Regulations, 2023.
The existing ‘Stock and Sale’ policy under Paragraph 2.79A of the Handbook of Procedures (HBP) of the Foreign Trade Policy (FTP) 2015-20 has been amended to revise the applicability of the policy for export from the Indian subsidiary of foreign company (applicant exporter) to its foreign parent/another subsidiary of foreign parent company and allow repeat […]
In the last couple of years, Indian securities market has seen tremendous growth, both in terms of volumes as well as in terms of number of participants. This increasing participation with increase of new investors in securities market also puts greater onus on SEBI to make markets safer for its participants, with a special focus on retail participants.
Ball Aerosol Packaging India Private Limited Vs ACIT (Gujarat High Court) In this case what emerges from the record is that no fresh tangible material distinct from what was made available by the petitioner during the assessment proceedings is emerging and specific queries which have been raised with regard to issues now raised have already […]
As directed by Hon’ble the Chief Justice, this is to convey for benefit of all the stakeholders that, Hon’ble the Supreme Court of India has launched a digital version of judgments of the Supreme Court of India as reported in ‘Supreme Court Reports’.
Jharkhand High Court held that benefit under SVLDRS scheme cannot be denied by the designated committee on the reason that department has decided to file an appeal against the OIO.
ITAT Delhi held that addition of difference between the share valued by the company and value determined as per IT Rules sustained as the assessee failed to discharge his onus of proof.
Bombay High Court held that purchases cannot be treated as unexplained expenditure (i.e. fictitious purchases) merely because suppliers have not appeared before AO or CIT(A).
Telangana High Court held that issuance of search warrant without recording the ‘reasons to believe’ is against the provisions of section 17 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002 and accordingly the same is liable to be set aside.
